Friday, April 19, 2019
English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

The latest football news from 90 Minutes Online

The problems with developing football's future star players

So Barcelona are European champions again. With Georgio Chiellini ruled out of the final, Patrice Evra had to justify the game’s other over-hyped sub-plot. And justify it he did - failing to react to Buffon’s parry and allowing Luis Suárez to nip in and crash the rebound home. But there was another barely-mentioned subtext to this game that deserves some thought.

 

 

In May 2008, Manchester United sold a 21-year-old Gerard Piqué to Barcelona for £5m. That same summer, United got £5.5m from Sunderland for Kieran Richardson.



Fast-forward 5 years. In the summer of 2012, Paul Pogba walked away from Old Trafford to join Juventus. For free. A month earlier, United paid £4m for Crewe teenager Nick Powell.



In a recent Telegraph poll, Pogba (45%) and Piqué (19%) were ranked as Ferguson’s two biggest Old Trafford failures - bigger even than the Jaap Stam (18%) and Bebé (7.5%) debacles.



It was the right decision at the time’



Of course, hindsight is always 20/20. The fact that Piqué has become one of the most decorated defenders in the history of the game with club and country, and the fact that Pogba is now regarded as the hottest midfield ticket in world football, doesn’t automatically mean it was a mistake - at the time - for either player to leave.



Nor should this be to blame for United’s subsequent struggles at the centre of their defence and midfield. After all, not all players who achieve world class calibre showed the potential for it by age 22.



Ferguson, of course, would point to obvious justifications for both departures. Piqué was homesick and longed to rejoin his boyhood club. And, in Nemanja Vidić and Rio Ferdinand, United had one of the finest centre back pairings in the world.



"I always thought he would do well. We were disappointed to lose him but we understood at the time that his family desire was to go back to Barcelona. He looked at Ferdinand and Vidić and wanted to be in the first team immediately.” -- Alex Ferguson on Piqué, before the 2009 Champions League Final

Gerard Pique at Manchester United (courtesy of Burton Mail)



With Pogba, Ferguson would say he did all he could to convince Pogba he was part of United’s future - giving the Frenchman his Premier League debut aged 18. But, in the end, the player showed a ‘lack of respect’ after having his head turned by agent Mino Raiola. Just desserts for the Manchester club perhaps, given the way they lured Pogba from Le Havre in the first place.



"Pogba signed for Juventus a long time ago as far as we're aware. It is disappointing. I don't think he showed us any respect at all, to be honest. I'm quite happy that if they carry on that way, they're probably better doing it away from us." -- Alex Ferguson on Paul Pogba


Paul Poga at Manchester United (courtesy of Caught Offside)



Regardless, it was difficult to watch both players contest Saturday’s Champions League final without indulging in a few ‘what ifs’. Could United’s recent struggles and the questionable legacy of Ferguson’s final years as manager been avoided?



Who will be the next Nemanja Matić?



Here’s a legitimate question: Which member of Chelsea’s 2014/15 loanee diaspora will become the superstar that slipped through Mourinho’s net?



In 5 years time, will we scratch our heads at how outstanding Croatian goalkeeper Matej Delač could possibly have walked away from Stamford Bridge for free?



Will Gaël Kakuta be setting the Eredivisie alight, prompting Chelsea to re-sign a player they acquired in 2008 and sent out on 7 successive loan spells until 2015?


Matic at Benfica (courtesy of Squawka.com)



This scenario has clear precedent. In January 2011, after completing half of a season-long loan at (you guessed it) Vitesse Arnhem, Nemanja Matić was gifted to Benfica along with £21m for Brazilian haircut David Luiz. Three years later, Chelsea paid the same sum to bring the impressive Serbian back to west London.



How elite level youth development works now



But this is what we should expect now, isn’t it? Watching the centerpiece event of world club football, both sides should be littered with talent that got away from one big club or other. Because that’s how youth football works now.



What Piqué and Pogba - and Matić - are is a damning indictment of elite level youth and reserve team football. Utterly pointless and bereft of any meaning whatsoever, elite clubs have decided to simply outsource the development of their potential stars to Europe’s second tier sides.



Promising young players around the world now take one of two routes into first team, elite level football:



  1. Appear at small club, sign for huge club at young age, complete string of loan spells with Europa League clubs in Holland, Switzerland, Portugal or Belgium. Sign permanent deal with club at this level, move to Champions League club after two or three impressive campaigns. See Nemanja Matić.



  1. Appear at huge club… repeat experience of 1. See... Gerard Delofeu?



You see? There is no difference, whether you come through at Burnley or Barcelona.


Matic signing for Chelsea (courtesy of World Soccer Talk)



With the financial clout that they have, the game’s biggest clubs know there’s no real gamble in letting young players leave. They can snaffle and discard smaller clubs’ promising talents on a whim, safe in the knowledge that buy-back and first-option clauses leave them just a cheque away from striking Piqué-sized clangers from the record.



"At that age it is good for the 'father' club to be protected, because sometimes the evolution of these players is good and sometimes bad. It is important to keep control of the situation. So when you have a player you can loan and even sell him but you still have ways of being in control.” -- Jose Mourinho on Matić



The philosophy is simple: “We really don’t believe you’ll be good enough, so go and play some football elsewhere. But, on the off chance you prove us wrong, we’re inserting this release clause and this buy-back option so that we can get you back for X amount.”



Isn’t that depressing?



 

Yes. Yes it is.

Web development by Grifello.com